|
Handbook for Principal InvestigatorsSPENDING THE AWARD "The University is great about making it easy for me to submit my proposal, but once I get the award, they won’t let me spend it!" Unfortunately, many faculty engaged in research feel this way. The philosophy of the Vice President for Research and the reporting units is to impose no more restrictions on principal investigators than that which is required by Federal law, State law, sponsor regulations, ABOR policy, or common sense. Unfortunately, the laws and regulations imposed on us by government are so voluminous and complicated, they overpower the Vice President’s minimalist philosophy. University faculty and Federal auditors hold two opposing points of view: University faculty believe that their grant funds are their own to support their research group; Federal auditors believe that the grant funds are to support a very specific project. The Federal auditors will win this battle of philosophies because the regulations are on their side. In the current environment, the principal investigator has no choice but to thoroughly understand the rules relevant to their grants and ensure that their expenditure activity is in compliance. Allowable Direct Costs Other tests of allowability: Can the cost be specifically identified with the project relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy? Is the cost reasonable? Is the cost given consistent treatment on all sponsored as well as non-sponsored funds? Does the cost conform to the terms of the award, University policy, State Law, and Federal Law? Is the cost generally recognized as necessary for the performance of the sponsored agreement? Examples of direct costs include:
Proposal Costs Rebudgeting For grants awarded under the terms of the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP), the investigator is not limited by the categorical breakout of the budget, unless the deviation from the budget represents a change in scope or objectives or if a significant part of the research is being transferred outside the University (usually in the form of a subcontract). As a rule-of-thumb, the NIH Agency-Specific Terms state that a deviation in a budget category of more than 25% of the total award may indicate a change in the scope or objectives of the project. See UA Policy "Direct and Indirect Costs of Sponsored Agreements" for rebudgeting administrative costs on Federal accounts. Sponsor Prior Approval |
Sponsored Projects Services is a unit of the Office of the Senior Vice President for Research |
Mailing Address: |
Express Mail Address: |
Phone: (520) 626-6000 |
The University of Arizona |
||